Igor Shoifot's Website |
|
DIRECT MAIL PROJECT
by Igor Shoifot
"Junk mail is an offer sent to the wrong person." George Duncan
"There are three ways to make your letter successful: Test, test and test." (Every Direct Mail guru)
Contents:
This report is a digest of dozens of books and articles, sprinkled with some ideas I was coming up with while reading the sources. It is intended to serve as a reference guide as well as a thought-provoking reading A. Preamble: Any successful direct mail campaign starts with an understanding of the universe in which the company is acting. The elements of this universe are:
Although one can (and will, of course) easily speculate about all of the above, only research can give us more or less accurate snapshot of this universe (it will be just a snapshot, because most elements will be changing even during the research.) Research can be conducted at almost no cost and is much more valuable than any expert advice, as no expert can analyze the unexplored circumstances. Second step is to define what can make our direct mail most successful.
B. The Structure. Here is the list of choices we have to make while creating a mailing piece: I. OUTER ENVELOPE 1. Format a). #10 business envelope b). 9x12 business envelope c). Oversized #12 or #13 envelope d). 6x9 "booklet" envelope e). Monarch "personal" envelope f). Square "invitation" envelope g). Poly and other novelty envelopes h). Closed face vs. window i). Literature code 2. Postage a). "Live" stamp (First Class or pre-cancelled Third Class) b). Meter c). Printed indicia 3. Mail Classification a). First class b). Third class bulk ["With regard to postage, a "live" (pre-cancelled) 3rd class stamp can help make Third Class Mail look like First Class, unless you plan to have illustrations and teasers all over the envelope."] c). Special (certified, express, FedEx, etc.) 4. Corner card a). Company name and address vs. none b). Writer's name (hand written or "typed" above company name) c). Product name vs. company name d). Logo conflict ("If the logo is an elaborate piece of work, it's best to use some simpler version on the envelope so it won't conflict and draw attention away from the teaser or other message. The same holds true for the letterhead vis-a-vis any headline of Johnson box that may be used at the top of the letter. I sometimes move the company logo or letterhead to the end of the letter where it won't distract from the headline message. Presumably, you're not selling your logo.") 5. Addressing a). Direct computer-addressed b). Cheshire label c). Hand addressed d). Personalization vs. none 6. Teaser a). Teaser vs. none b). Offer teaser c). Benefit teaser d). Curiosity or "hook" teaser e). Ancillary notations 7. Envelope "look and feel" a). Straight business (white wove) b). Official or monetary value (brown or gray craft) c). Big Event (four-color, display type, illustrations, etc.) d). Invitation/upscale e). Others (Also see I above). II. LETTER 1. Look and Feel a). Length b). Correspondence style vs. illustrated c). Letter/brochure d). Stock (white wove vs. ivory vellum, etc.) e). Personalization f). Headline vs. none g). Company letterhead vs. product vs. personal; top of letter vs. end of letter h). Single sheets vs. 11x17 folded i). Typeface(s) j). Handwritten notations k). P.S. III. BROCHURE 1. Test with and without 2. Look and Feel a). Size and folds b). Four-color vs. two-color c). Stock (matte/gloss/semi or dull-gloss) d). Illustrations (drawings vs. photos) e). Second order form f). Testimonials g). Offer h). Guarantee i). Call to action j). Company I.D. and contact information k). Literature code IV. REPLY DEVICE 1. Look and Feel a). Certificate/check design b). Four-color vs. two-color c). Illustrations vs. none d). Offer boilerplate copy ("Yes!...") e). Qualification questions (lead generation) f). Signature/phone # g). Detachable stub h). Action device 2. Billing a). Payment enclosed (hard offer) b). Credit cards c). Toll Free #/fax d). P.O.# e). Deadline date f). Name correction g). Key and literature codes V. LIFT LETTER 1. Test with and without 2. Look and feel a). Size b). Stock c). Letter vs. memo vs. other d). Offer e). Signature VI. PREMIUM INSERT 1. Test with and without 2. Look and feel a). Buckslip vs. folded b). Attached to reply device vs. loose VII. ALTERNATIVES 1. Sweepstakes 2. Proprietary "Telegram" package (The Western Union (http://www.wucs.com/) claims that its (available) Mailgram, Priority Letter and Custom Letter show opening rates up to 93%.) 3. Proprietary "Express" package (Mega Direct (1-800-826-2869) and Response Mail Express (1-800-795-2773) market high impact takes on USPS Express and Priority Mail packages.) 4. Self-mailer. B&W Press in Massachusetts boasts an impressive production of more than 8 million orders/envelopes per day for 2,500 customers. On the one hand, this economy of scale allows them to offer unbeatable prices, on the other hand, we would have to place an order (especially for our small quantities) in advance. (http://www.bwpress.com/electronicprepress.html) 5. Other "tricks"
C. Contents of the letter We will have to define, research and create the following:
Copy testing
Trade-off between cost and effectiveness is there any trade-off at all? (Surprisingly, sometimes a cheaper piece could be much more effective than a more expensive one.) It is only through an experiment that one can check if there is a correlation between cost and effectiveness. (Most often between the "amplifiers of perceived value"- prizes, free offers (even "just for contacting us!"), coupons, cash-back offers, etc. and the response rates.) "Everyone wants to get something for nothing." Bob Stone advocates greater use of the FREE offers, estimating more than a tenfold increase of net profits when gifts are used widely and generously. George Duncan suggests using certificate/check design "not so much because people think they are checks, but because the check-like verisimilitude projects value." On the other hand, one should be aware of the Freeloaders tribe and be very careful giving out offers that cost the company money and cost nothing to the customers (especially if there is not even a symbolic payment involved such as a stamp or an envelope.) Also,"the generally accepted rule among direct marketers is that the gift should be related to the product being sold." Well, may be a free Ben & Jerry ice-cream offered by Plymouth Rock should be played as "a low fat ice-cream, protecting your health and, thus, lowering an accident probability." (Or does it sound too silly?) Free gift can also be used as a lure for customer to contact the company "call us for your quote and we will send you your free ice-cream coupon just for asking." Measured level of entertainment and fun sufficient to make potential customer keep reading and considering contacting us (fun also creates good will, trust, desire to deal with a pleasant company, while dull mail cries: "Throw me away!") A good example could be a quiz "Are you using every opportunity to save on your auto insurance?" Lately "Interactive has become a buzzword", but the most successful direct mail must have "a hard-to-match ability to engage recipient, giving him/her many engaging options (e.g., tokens, puzzles, contests, etc.)" Follow-up mailing and possible quality improvement (the second attempt) "We are sure you are still considering our offer, so, here is an extra discount for you if you join in the next two weeks." This is a typical "second attempt mail." All sales people know that most customers are helpless against even a small discount in a moment of indecision. Besides, if the targeted audience was selected correctly and the mailing list used was rather good, it could be that a different message (combined with a slightly different offer) can persuade a customer who has already said no. Persuasiveness of the offer nobody believes unsubstantiated claims (i.e., tell the story about how exactly the environment will be helped, what exactly makes this offer terrific, how much money will be saved for the consumer). In fact, "if the message is too trivial, it may be screened out. Unsupported claims of "good service" "good taste" or "cleaning ability" fall under this general heading." People LOVE importantly looking graphs and numbers, comparative analysis and openness (to the extend of giving the competitors contact numbers to check what they offer usually, this is an especially impressive technique even if in fact the competitors offers are rather attractive.) One of the great ideas would be to offer simple statistics describing the profile of our most typical customers. Then, if we are right about them, the message behind this profile description would be: "how come you are still not among them!?" By the same rationale, people HATE long sentences almost as much as long letters from strangers and suspicious secrecy Power of the word FREE (as in "buy 1(or 2 or 3) get one free" or "1 (2-3) free months", etc.) or guarantee to beat any competitors price by certain % or "free 10 claim filing tips you might wish you have had read if continued inside", etc. Or may be just a post card (instead of the whole envelope) saying "send me your wonderful FREE brochure outlining the 10 claim filing tips I need to know and an information about your unbeatable offer together with the contact numbers of all your competitors, so that I could see for myself." In any case, proper incentives can make a huge difference. "A 1993 study by Southern Methodist University showed that customers who received promotional products reordered sooner than either coupon recipients or those who received only a sales letter. They also ordered 139 percent more than those who received only the letter. A 1991 study of trade shows by Exhibit Surveys Inc. found that promotional gifts increased booth traffic, raised responses to invitations, boosted the memorability of the occasion, and increased goodwill toward the company." Why the best offer is not always the best offer. Some consumers, especially older people, are suspicious of prices "too good to be true." In fact, "many mature consumers associate low-budget prices with products of dubious quality." This is why the selling proposition should be written extremely persuasively (that is, showing how the company manages to cut costs so deeply). Otherwise, some of attractiveness of any "no obligation" deal will be lost. People prefer to listen to how their needs will be satisfied, rather than reading a long story about how good the company is (just like the companies usually love talking about how wonderful they are forgetting to tell the customer what s/he gets out of it all!) An option to fill a questionnaire online and get a quote immediately may be very important some people are so in love with the Internet and think it is so convenient that they would only reply online. Membership card is another extremely useful technique (most successfully exploited by the AAA), especially if the membership card looks very attractive and/or original. Concise and clear appealing message right on the envelope. One of the most famous copywriters, Bill Jane, believes that the message on the envelope is extremely important: "What works for us is the outer envelope...that instantly waylays the prospect, captures his attention, engages him, intrigues him, grabs his curiosity. The outer envelope that wastes not a moment in commencing to make the sale. The outer envelope that orients the prospect immediately to the product, and very often to the offer, even before he gets inside." Here is the conclusion of a direct mail expert, Phil Dresden, after watching the "open throw away" behavior of a number of focus groups: the way to get them to open that envelope "is to have a simple message clearly stated with effective graphics keep it simple you only have a few seconds to make an impact. [The letter will be thrown away] "if the offer appears to be too much trouble, if it appears that the message is going to take some time and effort to get at." "A plain white envelope with "The White House" in the upper left corner, for example, doesn't need any further teaser except, perhaps, RSVP." Double- and triple- impact technique: series of mailings directed at the same customers each offering increasingly better deals. Analysis of the primary reason for our customers to buy our service. (In the case of EIA: is it the price, the service or the environmental reasons. Speculations, though inevitable, would not suffice here, and the best way to answer that question would be an accurate analysis of those, who did contact the agency and did become our customers.) Analysis of who the ideal customer is should include psychographic considerations (culture, self-image, temperament and personality type) are sometimes much more important than the demographic ones. The tool and result of such analysis could be a positioning grid, elements of which should be used in planning mailing strategy and editing the copy. It may look like this (just an example):
Segmentation can be a very challenging task, even its first stage defining the segments. But once discovered, defined and proved to exist, segments represent a powerful tool for accurate targeting and effective consequent message construction.
According to most sources, mailing lists account for 40% of campaign effectiveness, which is why at least the following basic questions should be asked (and answered) while dealing with mailing lists:
Brokers and other mailing list sources: Metromail offers lists at 4 cents a name for small lists and cheaper for larger lists. You can even get a list of mail-order buyers of insurance from Metromail at cheaper than 20 cents per name. It can also perform a multibuyer match matching a car owner list against a mail-insurance buyers list.
"Not counting merchandise sales of huge mail order companies , insurance companies lead the pack in sales via direct marketing methods." For many years total sales of insurance via mail never dropped below a few billion dollars a year. Leading mail order insurance companies are United Services Automobile Association, GEICO, Capital Holding, American Automobile Association, Colonial Penn, National Liberty, Physicians Mutual, and Old American Insurance Company. In 1986 4 insurance companies were among the top ten US direct marketers and three of them among the top ten mail order companies in the world. USAA, with 2.5 million members (and 2.6% of market share in Massachusetts), including 95 percent of all U.S. active-duty military officers, is "the fourth-largest homeowners' insurance provider and fifth-largest auto insurer in the United States. It is also the largest mail-order company in the U.S." The mail communications with the current customers of USAA are so effective that the company retains 96.4 percent of its property and casualty insurance customers, compared with an industry average of 85 percent. Its retention rate for life insurance customers is even better--96.8 percent, compared with the industry rate of 89 percent. Most insurance companies also use direct mail for "upgrading" and "downgrading" their policyholders for example, Allstate Insurance Co. uses direct mail to upgrade bodily injury coverage for the existing clients. Peoples Service Insurance Company rated by Weiss Ratings Inc. as on of top 10 cheapest auto insurance underwriters in the US, the only one New England company among the 10. Most large insurance companies use four-color printing more and more in their direct mail: "Sentry Insurance, in Stevens Point, Wis., says that 30 percent of its print jobs are four-color; Fireman's Fund Insurance, in Petaluma, CA, has a 60 percent four-color workload; Prudential, in Novelty, Ohio, says 60 percent of its work is four-color." Enclosed (as an Appendix) are:
Clearly, there are three major groups of auto insurance companies in Massachusetts in terms of growth Growing, Stagnating and Declining. Analysis of (very scarce) data about the former auto insurance providers for newly acquired clients shows that:
Evidently, if the tendencies identified above are true, Plymouth Rock should try and go specifically after "Losers."
Experts believe that the direct-marketing industry is experiencing "an influx of newcomers, who bring with them a mixed bag of confusion and misunderstanding." And there are a lot of professionals, who capitalize on this lack of knowledge and experience. Therefore, most experts advise companies to have an in-house expert somebody, who has had a substantial experience in direct mail and knows the industry well. "While there may have been a time when a more-is-better philosophy was appropriate, the cost of names, paper, printing, and postage has squeezed the direct marketers into a less-is-better mentality." Cost-savings can be achieved in each of the following elements of mailing:
Transporting to the post office According to all experts in the field of direct mail, this is one area that should always be entirely supervised by one professional company an agency or printer, because Murphys Law is the only one applicable to the technical side of direct mail. In the envelope, size really matters people are more accustomed to certain sizes associated with bills, checks, invitations, personal and important correspondence size #10 (4.125 by 9.5 inches). But most direct mailers still use the 6 by 9 envelope (apparently trying to emphasize the importance of the offer), which, according to one of the leading authorities on direct mail, in fact, hurts the mail "it is a size that says "advertising" and puts people on guard." Surprisingly, again, a cheaper piece may prove to be more successful. "Another way to get attention is to go smaller than a #10 [to give the envelope] a strong personal look and feel." Almost the same logic is applicable to the size of the letter. 15 years ago people tended to read more and total number of newspapers, magazines and books sold per capita was much higher. Now, nobody reads long letters people have no time and short attention span. Therefore, the letter should be as short as possible as long as it doesnt hurt its persuasiveness. (Experts advise against eliminating information just "for the sake of brevity.") Many organizations and groups, such as Consumer Union, Smithsonian and others, support their publications by mailing millions and millions of letters at non-profit rates. And response rate to their mailings is much higher than average. An option for us would be to offer such organization a free brochure on how the environment can be saved by driving less (including a coupon for our low rate insurance.)
Costs are a tricky matter. Sometimes marginal increase in costs may result in significant growth of revenues. For example, if Crushbusters carry some snack and coffee for nervous and unhappy customers (strategic partnership with, say, Starbucks or any other of hundreds of coffee shops in town?), the cost would be negligible, but the value added is enormous! In any case, reckless spending on direct mail does not guarantee great results. (But many companies dont follow this obvious rule. One New Yorker estimated that through the year the nonprofit organizations spent more money on repetitive solicitations from him than he donated.) One of the most basic ways to save costs per/M (that is per 1,000 mail pieces) is to increase the volume. Here is a typical estimate (same rule applies to lists):
Of all the applications of different direct marketing methods, for the "insurance companies none is more dramatic than "third-party selling" upon a recommendation of an affinity group, such as a union, a fraternal organization, an oil company credit card group, an alumni association or a senior citizen organization The most dramatic application has been done against the AARP (American Association of Retired People) membership list." One of the reasons for such successes is that "the key to successful direct marketing is the element of trust." Another one is in accurate targeting and strong appeal. "As a rule-of-thumb response for individual pieces in a co-op is about one-fourth the response of a solo mailing." Yet, according to the same source, "quoting averages is always dangerous" and often such dramatic decline is a result of bad decisions on whom to cooperative with. It is clear that if the mail list is "right" and the message was chosen correctly, cooperating with another company, provided it is as appealing to the potential customers, can never hurt, but will increase the interest of the customer and the perceived value. Besides, this number (.25 coefficient) is skewed by ValPack and such sending dozens of different companies coupons in one envelope. The cost, on the other hand, is also usually lower in coop mailings also one-fourth. It is interesting that many companies experienced in direct mail have been conducting coop mailing for decades with great success. It is especially effective to receive any sort of "approved by" seal even if by some small group. For that purpose companies submit themselves for ratings and examinations of any sort by different groups and organizations. Inserts could be a cheat solution. The price of an insert offered by such companies as Lee Wards, Nora Nelson and Sessions Records (with more than a million households on their lists) runs under 10 cents. Much more advanced cooperative mailing technique consists of finding a strategic partner rather than just saving money on mailing and sharing costs. For EIA such partners could be environmental groups and agencies, environmental magazines (like National Geographic, etc. especially those with split runs), sometimes offering their own mailing services at lower costs. Greenpeace USA, for example, sends 25,000,000 pieces of literature each year. Another idea is to sponsor a mailing for a good cause (only for known donors) including just a reply card or a phone number for potential customers. The "second letter" or "publishers letter" [see Exhibit Publishers Letter] is a powerful tool, increasing response rate by 10% according to repeated tests. In such letter an editor/president/director of the partner-company talks about a great offer that comes to the clients through the partnership with another company. The most effective strategy in cooperative mailing is developing "joint sales messages, which point out the combined strengths of your products and companies. The combined sales message should be more compelling than yours or your partners message alone." On some occasions companies save a lot of money just exchanging the mail lists. It could be a great idea provided both companies are equally interested and both lists consist of the customers the companies really want to target.
Classical "customer flow" in direct marketing is usually defined as Suspect-Prospect-Customer-Client-Advocate. People, selected on a mailing list(-s) because they satisfy certain criteria, are Suspects. When people return a response device asking for more information or a trial they turn into Prospects. Those, who actually contact the company and make a purchase are Customers, some of whom soon drop out, leaving the company with Clients. Once a Client is satisfied with the product and/or service he or she may turn into an Advocate, referring others to the company (possibly through special offers like "subscribe your friend and get one month free" or " get a prize") "Trying to sell without knowing the target audience is like buying a birthday gift for someone you don't know." "The best product, properly priced, packaged superbly, and accompanied by copy that describes it with utmost taste and irresistibility will fail miserably as a direct-mail offer if it is sent to an unqualified or blatantly inappropriate audience. The list selection process is critical to the success (or failure) of any direct-mail project, and is probably the single most important component of the campaign."
A good mailing list has certain characteristics that make it work well for other mailers. To begin with, the source of the names is very important. The names with the highest market value are those of people who responded to a direct mail offer ("proven responders"). Space-sourced names people who requested more information after seeing an ad in a magazine, for example, are next in quality. Then come lists of individuals who responded to a survey and offered specific information that marked them as targets for certain offers. There are usually four major types of segmentations:
Many researchers believe that consumers most likely to be responsive to a direct mail are:
According to a recent research, "the most technology-minded households are also the most enthusiastic recipients of targeted direct-mail offers; even though they receive more direct mail that the average household." In fact, when asked a question "Do you enjoy receiving mail solicitations that are targeted to your interests?" 77% of all households said yes, and 92% of this the most technology-minded households said yes. It is the industry standard that a list should come with a data card, reflecting the number of names on the list, type of the list, its source and segmentation options. To figure out what the customers want, one may just ask customer a question or two. "Asking questions of customers, prospects, and suspects through mail questionnaires has become a useful and relatively inexpensive method." This allows to define what is it exactly that makes the customers contact us. Although the environmental issues are clearly not the most important factor in our customers buying behavior, according to Mark Feldman, vice president of the cause-related marketing practice at Cone Communications, a Boston-based marketing firm, "three quarters of consumers say they'll switch brands" to a company involved with a charitable cause, if price and quality are equal. Shown below are a few of the more popular suppression criteria being used by list processing service bureaus. The degree of difficulty and the costs associated with the particular suppression technique vary from item to item. In some cases, proprietary methods are used to develop the suppression list, making for some interesting competitive advantages among service bureaus.
In terms of strategic targeting there are two possible strategies: 1. "Skimming off" targeting the most likely prospects from a large audience. Much cheaper per letter, yet producing not as good response rates as the next strategy. 2. "High-penetration" squeezing every sale out of a smaller target market. Usually much more expensive (over $2,000 CPM and more more than $2 expenses per letter), yet much more effective.
Analysis of the results and major ratios characterizing each mailing
*Please, see Response Forecasting file for a spreadsheet allowing to predict weekly response based on the previous weeks responses.
Testing is one of the best ways to save on costs, as "there is no reason to invest a large amount of resources in a direct-mail program unless there is a high probability of success." Industry standard for a representative and adequate mail sampling size is 5,000. (Also see enclosed Table 16-1 copied from Bob Stones classical book.) Statisticians suggest a much more complicated formula: Thus, for an acceptable sample error (e) of $0.25(in other words, if we are willing to be off by 25 cents on each customers acquisition estimate), confidence of 99% (for which the value of Z is 2.6) and standard deviation (sd) equal $1.0 sample size will be equal (6,76)(1)/.0625 = 108.6, or 109 letters.) It is important to test how the message was perceived and remembered as an audience usually "attends, partially attends, or does not attend to the message and remembers all, part or none of it." Testing is usually done in the following table:
In short: we have to test lists against copies (and different copies may result in different pull for different lists - or rather fractions of lists in our case). So, we should just create a few rather different copies, divide the list into a few "sublists", and use the cross-testing table above (set ready for convenience in Excel as the "cross-testing table" file.) In greater details: "The factors that affect response are just five: 1. Copy - the words you use to create your appeal 2. Package - the "attire" your appeal wears 3. Offer - your appeal 4. Timing - when your appeal arrives 5. List - to whom your appeal is directed
"After you have a reasonably adequate mailing, these factors can be improved, through careful testing, as follows:
"This indicates that testing is most productive when offers and lists are varied. If all other factors must be held for budgetary reasons, then you should spend your money testing various list segments." The incomplete list of things we can test (did I miss anything below?):
It seems like there are way too many things on this list, and, as always, Im probably thinking too much of a long-term project, so, apparently, we can only test a few most important elements and throw away the rest. A separate question is how to test the mailing list (especially if it is true that it could be improved 1000%! vs. 20% for a copy.) Here is a list of questions to ask (and answer): 1.Where did this list come fromwhat is its source? 2.Is the sample a truly random sample? 3.Is the Nth* name selection representative of the entire list? Or of a special selection from within the whole? *(Nth is a term which means a random selection from the total. Such as every 5th or 10th or 22nd name available from the total list.) 4.Is the survey sample large enough to give us meaningful and measurable results? 5.Could the list have been "preheated"? That is, were there any outside factors that might affect our results? 6.Did the list owner/broker have any special reason for the selection method used? 7.Did all the lists included in the test belong in the test? 8.When we measured the results, were all the responses reported and counted? 9.Did we use percents because the raw numbers looked bad? 10.Are the results consistent with previous results? 11.When we evaluated all the results, on what basis did the winner win? 12. Testing mailing lists and offers together is also important for both consumer and business program. So we can determine which lists pull best against which offer.
There are a few ways to "rate" a list broker according to that individual's or company's expertise. Here are a few of the attributes to look for when choosing a list broker: A great deal of knowledge and experience in the categorical product group being marketed Working knowledge of your competition and the impact your competition might have on the project at hand Good negotiating skills and an understanding of your future plans, so the best possible terms can be agreed on for continuations A competent support staff, who will be readily available to ensure good tracking and smooth overall production and delivery of lists An ability to provide in-depth information regarding lists, including their make-up, future growth, and other facets that have even the smallest bearing on their performance. Who has used the recommended lists? Which of these mailer-users have come back to re-use the lists? EVALUATING A LIST A) The QUALITY of the list 1. RECENCY: How new are the names and addresses? Were they derived/compiled over a span of years or months? How often is the list updated (i.e., new names added and old ones removed)? Can the most recent buyers/subscribers be selected? 2. FREQUENCY: Does this list indicate if the buyers are repeat customers (if applicable)? Are they buyers of different products from the same source? 3. DOLLAR AMOUNT: How much money did the customer spend for this product? Is the price of the product I am offering significantly higher? Lower? Comparable? 4. GENDER: Does the information about this list indicate whether most of the customers are men or women? Can I select men or women only? 5. AGE: Does the nature of this list inform me about the age range of the customers? If so, how does this compare with the usual age range of buyers for my product? 6. MARITAL STATUS/FAMILY INFORMATION: Do the demographics of this list-information indicating whether the customers are married, have children, own or rent their home, use credit cards or have a certain income level- match my knowledge about previous buyers of the product I am offering? 7. GEOGRAPHIC AREA: Can individuals be picked out in certain areas only? 8. TELEPHONE NUMBERS: Although there are only a handful of response lists available with phone numbers, it never hurts to inquire! 9. TYPE OF PURCHASE: Did the product that these customers bought indicate any likelihood that they will be inclined to purchase my product? B) GROWTH: In addition to knowing how frequently a list is updated, it's also important to know whether or not the product specified on the list is attracting more customers. C) QUANTITY: Are there enough names for a minimum order in the geographic area to which I am mailing? If my initial mailing works, will there be enough names for subsequent mailings?
"New life" should be given to the control package from time to time, otherwise response results start to sag because you keep mailing it to the same lists over and over again. Here are some ideas:
Tips For Creating Better Envelope Teasers 1. The envelope design and teaser copy should reflect the image of the product and the audience it's being targeted to. Don't shout when you should whisper. Don't be white collar when you should be blue collar. Don't be formal when you should be informal. 2. Don't tell too much with your teaser. If the prospect thinks s/he understands your offer, there's no incentive to go any further... unless it's so appealing that the prospect decides to order from teaser copy alone. To be safe, tell just enough with the teaser to make the reader want to find out more. 3. Teaser copy/graphics should promise a user benefit--expressed or implied--through any number of teaser techniques:
The reasons mailing campaign brings mediocre results are usually a combination of a few of the following:
There are dozens of opinions about what is a normal response rate. Some experts believe that "response rates to prospects (non-customers) [usually] average around 1%." Others (most of them) say that normal response is 2%. George Duncan believes it could be any number depending on how attractive the offer is and how well the customers are targeted. Bob Stone quotes as a typical example (not an average number!) 7.25% response rate (RR) to house list based mailing and 3.73 and 4.45% for "proven rented lists." A few final thoughts (not by me, but by one of the direct mail gurus, Ed Nash):
Appendix A An Example of Free Brochure rewarding potential customers for reading the letter. (http://www.murray-macdonald.com/auto.htm) 1. Opt For A Stable Insurer - While most insurers provide fair settlements, time is money, too. Be sure the carrier you choose has a reputation for fast claim service. 2. Don't Over-Insure - For example, if your car is over 5 years old, maybe you should consider dropping collision insurance. 3. Don't Under-Insure - Saving a few dollars up front could cost you a significant amount of money at a time of loss. 4. Select The Right Deductible - By "self insuring" what you can afford, deductibles can save you significant premium dollars. 5. Choose The Appropriate Limits - Don't underestimate jury awards- often they are astronomical. Consider liability coverage carefully. 6. Excess Liability - This is economical coverage that picks up where your auto (and homeowners) liabilities leave off. It can save huge amounts in the event of an extremely large judgement against you. 7. The Comprehensive Coverage Question - Without this option, you will not be paid for fire, theft, vandalism or other losses out of your control. 8. Uninsured Motorist Coverage - This is an important dollar saver in the event you are the victim of a "hit and run driver", or one without insurance. 9. Towing and Replacement Vehicles - Following an accident, without this coverage, you might suffer an "out of pocket" expense to mover your auto or rent a replacement car. 10 Collision Coverage - If you have a car load, this insurance is required but you should protect your interests too in the event your car is badly damaged by unknown persons. 11 Ask About Discounts - There are a large number of discounts currently available to Massachusetts Automobile Policyholders.
Main Sources http://all-about-mall.com/mlm/report12.htm Inc. Magazine Jackobson, Michael and Mazur, Laurie Ann. Marketing Madness. Westview Press, 1995 Ljungren, Roy. The Business-To-Business Direct Marketing Handbook. American Management Association. 1989 Lumpkin, J.R., Caballero, M.J. and Chonko, L.B., Direct Marketing, Direct Selling, and Mature Consumer. Quorum Books, 1989 MacKain, Lorrie. Learning About Lists. Marketing Tools. June 1996 McLean, Ed. Direct Mail Envelopes Molloy Michael and Molloy Mary, Partnering for Profit. Marketing Tools, October 1996 Montague, Claudia. First Class Delivery. Marketing Tools, October 1995 Nash, Edward. Direct Marketing. McGraw-Hill, 1982 Neubauer, Bob. Color Printing Policies. Target Marketing. May 30, 1998 Ostroff, Jeff. Successful Marketing to the 50+ Consumer. Prentice Hall, 1989 Pavely, Richard W.When Less Is More. - Marketing Tools. November/December 1995 Piirto Heath, Rebecca. An Engraved Invitation. - Marketing Tools, November/December 1997 Roberts, M. L., Berger, P.D. Direct Marketing Management. Prentice Hall, 1989 Roman, Ernan. Customers for Life - Marketing Tools, July/August 1996 Sales and Marketing Management Magazine Sales Marketing Network. June 3, 1998 Sroge, Maxwell. The Catalogue Marketer. The Catalogue marketer Newsletter. Direct Marketing World. June 5, 1995. Vol. 14, No. 16 Stilson, Galen. How To Give New Life To Your Control Package - http://www.smartbiz.com/sbs/columns/stil7.htm Stone, Bob. Successful Direct Marketing Methods. Chicago, 1984 The Direct Mail/Marketing Educational Foundation Publications Tom Collins, Fundraising. McGraw-Hill United States Census Bureau Publications |